Cannonball Read IV

A bunch of Pajibans reading and reviewing and honoring AlabamaPink.

Fofo’s #CBR4 Review #21: REAMDE by Neal Stephenson

Target: Neal Stephenson’s REAMDE

Profile: Fiction, Political Thriller, Suspense?

My level of dislike for this book borders on irrational.  My first pass at the review had nothing good to say about it at all.  That wasn’t exactly fair, so here’s Version 2.  REAMDE is a fantastic idea that has been tossed into a river with the lead weights of Stephenson’s writing style, 600 extra pages and a dozen extraneous plot lines.  Now, if you happen to be irrationally fond of exposition, you might really enjoy this book.  I didn’t.

Part of this is my fault.  Stephenson and I have had a rocky relationship at best.  I slogged through the Baroque Cycle a few years ago on a friend’s recommendation, and while I didn’t hate those books, I definitely didn’t love them either.  Snow Crash was great.  And Cryptonomicon was solid too, but all of his books suffer from a similar pathology of being overwritten and heavy on the exposition.  REAMDE goes a little beyond that and ponderously drags around extraneous PoV characters, plot lines, and MacGuffins galore for no tangible payoff.

The setup is pretty clever.  A nasty virus targeting players of the MMORPG T’Rain inadvertently hits a money manager for the Russian mob, whose boss then kidnaps Zula Forthrast, niece of T’Rain’s founder, Richard Forthrast, and her hacker boyfriend to try and track down the virus makers in China.  Hijinks ensue.  The problems start coming as Stephenson adds increasingly complicated and unlikely plot twists.  The Chinese hackers have holed up underneath an Islamic terror cell, and when the bust goes bad all hell breaks loose.

Read the rest of the review… (WARNING: Light spoilers follow)

Single Post Navigation

One thought on “Fofo’s #CBR4 Review #21: REAMDE by Neal Stephenson

  1. petalfrog on said:

    Great review! A shame that you seemed to really enjoy some parts but the overall bad plotting and writing style ruined it all. I’ve never heard of this author, but am pretty sure the only person who I am willing to read 1000 pages of is Stephen King.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.